SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS
Asset Classes
-
Offices
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
-
Enclosed Shopping Centres
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
-
Open Air Retail
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
-
Light Industrial
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
-
Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
Health Care Facilities
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
Universal
-
-
-
-
-
- Not applicable
-
-
-
Focus Area
Energy and Carbon
Topic
Energy and Carbon Conservation Measures
Question #
E5.2 – Conservation Achieved
Question
Is there evidence that energy efficiency has improved, or carbon emissions reduced due to measures implemented in the past five years?
Applicability
All asset classes
Owner/landlord occupied building
Tenant occupied building – systems managed by the owner/landlord
Answer & Scoring
- Yes = Points as indicated below
Select all that apply:
-
- Energy Efficiency Improved = 1 point
- Carbon Emissions Reduced = 2 points
- No = 0 points
- Not applicable – Tenant occupied building: No systems managed by the owner/landlord = 0/0
Max of 3 points
Requirements
- Identify the energy and or carbon reduction measures implemented in the past five years that are known to have caused energy efficiency or carbon reductions
- Reference measured data and prepare high-level M&V analysis to demonstrate efficiencies or reductions achieved
- Describe performance before the measure(s) were implemented and how performance changed after the measure(s) were implemented
- Describe how operational changes due to Covid etc. were considered and excluded from the high-level M&V analysis
Savings achieved can be specific to a particular ECM or CRM, or may apply to the whole-building, whatever data is available.
Documentation
- High-level calculations and brief narrative describing reductions achieved
Suggested Lead
In-house
Value
- Use high-level conservation calculations to confirm that implemented conservation measures are significantly reducing the building energy consumption and carbon emissions
- Conservation measures may need to be reassessed if implemented measures are not effective
Description
The real impact of specific energy improvement or carbon reduction measures is often clouded by the impact of ancillary operational activities and equipment performance, as well as pre-and post-retrofit measurement and verification (M&V) methods. Consider to what extent the weather and occupancy contribute to the before and after consumption or emission results and normalize the data accordingly. Operations and maintenance (O&M) activities changed substantially during Covid, and O&M activities post-Covid may also differ from pre-Covid activities. There may be other factors that impact performance before and after implementation, whether it is the consultants providing support, the measurement devices used, the timing of measurement intervals etc. Establish measuring parameters before the implementation of the ECMs or CRMs to develop more reliable results.
References
Adapted BB 3.0 Question
New in BOMA BEST 4.0